Selection bias: A missing factor in the Obesity Paradox debate
نویسندگان
چکیده
The September issue of Obesity featured articles by Tobias and Hu (1) and Flegal and Kalantar-Zadeh (2) that explored the observation that, in clinical populations, such as individuals with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes, those with higher BMI often have lower mortality rates than leaner individuals. The articles disagree whether this phenomenon, known as the obesity paradox, is a true causal effect. Flegal and KalantarZadeh assert that the research on the obesity paradox is consistent with greater BMI conferring “modest survival advantages” (2). Tobias and Hu disagree, arguing that the obesity paradox is likely an “artifact of methodological limitations” (1).
منابع مشابه
Body mass index and death by stroke: no obesity paradox.
IMPORTANCE Reports of an obesity paradox have led to uncertainty about secondary prevention in obese patients with stroke. The paradox is disputed and has been claimed to be an artifact due to selection bias. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the obesity paradox in stroke is real or an artificial finding due to selection bias. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We studied survival after stroke ...
متن کامل"The obesity paradox" in disease--is the protective effect of obesity true?
Although obesity and the associated metabolic syndrome negatively impact on health outcomes, a paradoxical relationship between obesity and mortality has been reported for specific patient populations - the "obesity paradox". However, underlying mechanisms remain unclear and several possible explanations are being discussed. First, a true protective effect of obesity is possible, mediated throu...
متن کاملThe obesity paradox: understanding the effect of obesity on mortality among individuals with cardiovascular disease.
OBJECTIVE To discuss possible explanations for the obesity paradox and explore whether the paradox can be attributed to a form of selection bias known as collider stratification bias. METHOD The paper is divided into three parts. First, possible explanations for the obesity paradox are reviewed. Second, a simulated example is provided to describe collider stratification bias and how it could ...
متن کاملLinear Models: A Useful “Microscope” for Causal Analysis
This note reviews basic techniques of linear path analysis and demonstrates, using simple examples, how causal phenomena of non-trivial character can be understood, exemplified and analyzed using diagrams and a few algebraic steps. The techniques allow for swift assessment of how various features of the model impact the phenomenon under investigation. This includes: Simpson’s paradox, case–cont...
متن کاملCollider Bias Is Only a Partial Explanation for the Obesity Paradox
BACKGROUND "Obesity paradox" refers to an association between obesity and reduced mortality (contrary to an expected increased mortality). A common explanation is collider stratification bias: unmeasured confounding induced by selection bias. Here, we test this supposition through a realistic generative model. METHODS We quantify the collider stratification bias in a selected population using...
متن کامل